Posts Tagged ‘media’

Now for something completely different…

This isn’t a blog post. Well, not one written by me, anyway.

LAF_2842 - Version 2

But since this space is all about me and what I think, what better place to share exciting news about my writing?

I’m delighted to announce that I am now an official contributor to Eclectablog. It’s an outstanding source of news and commentary, and I’m honored to be part of the team.

You can read the official announcement and an interview with me here.

Medium and message

The medium is the message, but the message fuels the medium.

To me, that’s the essence of effective communication (with, of course, a hat tip to Marshall McLuhan).

It’s also essential to how we absorb ideas that are communicated to us — online, in print, on television, person-to-person or what have you.

Yes, we have more options than ever before for finding and assimilating information. That’s a good thing.

And yes, content must be tailored to the medium. There’s a reason tweets are 140 characters and blog posts are, in theory, limitless.

But no medium can ever replace relevant messaging. Nor can messaging exist without a medium to convey it.

By all means, use every medium possible to reach your audience. But if the message isn’t meaningful, just don’t expect it to hit the target.

 

 

“House” fails while Hugh Laurie prevails

The TV show House isn’t very good anymore. But Hugh Laurie just keeps getting better and better.

I’ve always been a big fan of the show, particularly Hugh Laurie. His performance is consistently excellent and, well, I have a crush on him, too. (Full disclosure.)

For the most part, it’s been a quality show. It’s hit some rough spots, like the Survivor-esque competition to fill the empty spots on House’s team a few seasons ago. But it’s always managed to bounce back.

I don’t think it will this time. The new characters are just attempts to re-boot old ones that didn’t work all that well before — again, on House’s team. The smart, sexy, spunky brunette; the awkward yet brilliant neophyte. There’s a reason the earlier incarnations aren’t still around.

"House" fails while Hugh Laurie prevails

There’s some hope in the current House-Wilson storyline (and Robert Sean Leonard is always excellent, too, not incidentally), but I think this is it. The show hasn’t jumped the shark yet and I hope it doesn’t. But I predict this is the last season.

I think even the writers can tell. Perhaps I’m sensing their heavy sighs of disinterest. Sometimes you can almost hear it in the storytelling.

But despite that, or maybe because of it, Hugh Laurie’s performance keeps getting better and better — in sometimes subtle and stunning ways. I’ve always been in awe of his acting (and accent) on the show. Over eight seasons, the way his character has developed and evolved is brilliant and visceral, it seems. Laurie has gotten inside the skin of Gregory House. He’s extremely comfortable there. His exuberant disregard for the rules (and largely, often sadly, other people) is effortless. When House is in pain, what Laurie shows us is heartbreaking. It’s humanizing.

But as the show seems like it’s becoming broader (perhaps unintentionally veering toward self-parody), Laurie is becoming more intimate. I wish I could pinpoint the episode — it was within the last week or two — but there was a moment. Someone said something to him, and in response Laurie/House said more with the twitch of an eye than pages of dialogue ever could.

Hugh Laurie knows Gregory House better than I’d bet many people know their own selves. Some of that is being an actor; some of that is being a genius, which I think Laurie is, particularly in this role.

So no matter how bad the show might get — and I do hope it improves — I will keep watching. Because I can’t wait to see what Hugh Laurie does next.

« « View Older Posts